Study | Civic engagement does not improve well-being
Whether somebody engages civically or not, does not substantially influence their well-being. This is the central finding from two recent studies from Germany and the UK, conducted by researchers from the Universities of Vechta and Bochum. The studies were published in Journal of Happiness Studies and in Social Indicators Research. These results run contrary to the assumption that civic engagement contributes to well-being of engaged persons.
Voluntary fire brigades, food banks, homeless shelters or citizens’ initiatives: The opportunities for civic engagement are manifold. Civic engagement brings structure and meaning to the lives of engaged individuals and hence makes these happier and more satisfied – at least it is a widespread belief among researchers and lay people. In old age in particular, civic engagement is thought to compensate well for lack of paid work or of family responsibilities. However, the assumption that civic engagement appreciably improves well-being cannot be confirmed by their data, say Matthias Lühr, research associate at the University of Vechta, Maria K. Pavlova, a professor in Vechta, and Maike Luhmann, a professor at the University of Bochum.
The researchers analysed already existing datasets (SOEP and BHPS together with its continuation, Understanding Society – see box). Lühr, Pavlova and Luhmann utilised data from 17.720 (SOEP) and 18.550 (BHPS) survey participants, who reported on the frequency of their political (for instance, in political parties or citizens’ initiatives) and non-political (such as church-related) voluntary engagement. Their well-being was assessed via multiple indicators (such as life satisfaction, emotional well-being, low loneliness and control beliefs). The researchers tried to find out whether the participants reported higher well-being in the years when they were comparatively more civically engaged (or engaged at all) than in the years with lower or no civic engagement.
The answer was „no“, with few exceptions. Both in Germany and in the UK, older adults did appear to benefit from non-political engagement because their life satisfaction was higher in the years when they were more frequently engaged. However, this difference was small and not observed for other well-being indicators. Other leisure activities, such as socializing with friends and acquaintances, sometimes showed more pronounced associations with participants’ well-being, also in old age.
It is well possible, admit the researchers, that civic engagement boosts well-being of engaged individuals in certain contexts, depending on their needs, on where the activity takes place, on its content and finally on the society and culture. Such benefits do not appear to be universal, though. Civically engaged individuals should therefore not expect their activity to make them happier. Besides, the alleged benefits of engagement to the engaged should not feature as key incentives in volunteer recruitment messages. The actual purpose of civic engagement remains unchanged: voluntary contributions to the common good and to the democratic processes in the society. They have little to do with self-interest.
SOEP und BHPS/Understanding Society
The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) and the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) are nationally representative surveys that have been run since 1984 (SOEP) and 1991 (BHPS). These are panel surveys: For many years, the same persons are being surveyed yearly.
Contact for scientific information:
Institute of Gerontology
University of Vechta
Driverstr. 23, 49377 Vechta
Tel. 04441 / 15731
Lühr, M., Pavlova, M. K. & Luhmann, M. They are doing well, but is it by doing good? Pathways from nonpolitical and political volunteering to subjective well-being in age comparison. Journal of Happiness Studies 2021, DOI: 10.1007/s10902-021-00480-4
Lühr, M., Pavlova, M. K. & Luhmann, M. Nonpolitical versus political participation: Longitudinal associations with mental health and social well-being in different age groups. Social Indicators Research 2021, DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02777-6